Geoff Boucher builds a genuinely disturbing archive of rightwing insurgency fiction and reads it through a Lacanian update of Adorno, but the psychoanalytic technique that produces his best insight is also flexible enough to find that insight almost anywhere.
Critical theory is a method for asking how a technology is made, whose interests it serves, and whose labor it depends on. AI makes those questions a basic literacy for democratic life.
A conference volume that pairs a genuinely valuable prosopographical database with twelve case studies chosen more by who showed up to a 2022 conference than by any systematic survey of the field.
The series finale: how minimal computing and GO::DH turn digital preservation into a shared practice of plain text, static sites, and global collaboration.
Why digital humanities projects die from link rot, dead software, and funding cliffs, and how persistent identifiers and repositories keep them alive.
Why the humanities need digital methods right now: the digitized record, public scholarship, open teaching, honest answers to skeptics, and the AI moment.
Why theology and religious studies need digital humanities: the infrastructures, ethics, and pedagogy shaping how scholars work with sacred texts and sounds.
A practical, opinionated guide to digital humanities tools for dissertation writers, from Zotero and Tropy to Knight Lab interactives and CORE deposits.
What the digital humanities are, where they came from, and why the definition debates still matter, from Father Busa's punched cards to Zotero and beyond.
A genuinely distinguished contributor roster surveys sixty years of Habermas, but the volume's title promises critique more uniformly than its chapters, several of which read as sympathetic exposition, actually deliver.
Christian Fuchs gets genuine mileage out of reading Marcuse and Honneth against Facebook, but the book's Facebook-era horizon and its short shrift to Habermas, the thinker its own subtitle foregrounds, have not aged well a decade on.
Neal Harris mounts a genuinely sharp takedown of Axel Honneth's recognition paradigm, but the Fromm-Marcuse alternative he offers in its place is asserted with more confidence than it has earned.