The Unforced Force: Habermas and How Best Practice Gets Settled
Jürgen Habermas separates practice argued out among practitioners from practice handed down by money or command, and leaves behind a portable audit for telling the two apart.
Jürgen Habermas separates practice argued out among practitioners from practice handed down by money or command, and leaves behind a portable audit for telling the two apart.
Giroux moves pedagogy out of the classroom and into film, policy, and platforms, and then the question becomes which institution teaches your field its common sense.
Theory is never the destination for a scholar-practitioner; the rhythm is praxis, theory, praxis, and the test at the end is the question a friend asks over coffee.
Three lenses on innovation (diffusion, encoding, leading change), one philosophical move underneath them, and two tests any proposal has to survive.
A walk through the Frankfurt School’s claim that thinking becomes critique only when it accounts for its own historical situation, institutions, and consequences.
How to end a piece of practice-based scholarship: implications that point forward, reflection that grows from the argument instead of decorating it, and an abstract written after everything else.
Kremer and Jackson-Paton’s reflexive method braids autobiography, ethnography, and participatory epistemology into a discipline for naming where you stand when you judge.
How a practice of radical presence became a defensible method: its dimensions, the dissertations that built it, and the point where it meets autoethnography.
How de Kock’s model of integration turns the literature review into a conversation partner and makes the researcher’s own location part of the evidence.
A reading of de Kock’s Embodied Wisdom, and what changes when a doctoral program treats a practitioner’s working life as the ground of inquiry.
De Kock’s five movements turn a professional frustration into a defined problem, a disciplined inquiry, and something a community can actually use.
Why de Kock counts community as part of rigor, what contribution means outside a discipline, and what judgment still requires of us in an age of capable tools.